Author Archives: VoV Contributor

PUBLIC STATEMENT AND REQUEST FOR FORMAL CLARIFICATION BY MOZILLA CORPORATION REGARDING THE RESIGNATION OF CEO BRENDAN EICH

PUBLIC STATEMENT AND REQUEST FOR FORMAL CLARIFICATION BY MOZILLA CORPORATION REGARDING THE RESIGNATION OF CEO BRENDAN EICH

Update: Read the article on LifeSiteNews.com by clicking here

Date: 04/04/14

 

To:  Mozilla Corporation

 

In review of the recent circumstances which resulted in the resignation of Brendan Eich as CEO of Mozilla Corporation significant concerns of a large number of individuals and businesses have been raised.  Those affected include organizations comprised and representative of those individuals who have changed or seek to change their sexual preference, their supporters and supporting businesses, and individuals and businesses supporting Mozilla and supporting or participating Mozilla employees.  Upon review of details reported in the press and statements made both during and after Mr. Eich’s resignation by Mozilla, our organizations have made the following observations and conclusions:

WHEREAS – Mozilla touts an inclusive, safe environment embracing and defending diversity within its organization, it contrarily allowed for a workplace environment so hostile to Mr. Eich as to pressure him into resignation.

WHEREAS – Mozilla touts inclusiveness within its business, it inappropriately uses personal and private opinions, including non-work related activities, as a justification to allow for a hostile workplace environment in support of internal populist politics and to punish employees for their rightful participation in matters of public policy.

WHEREAS – Mozilla defends the notion of diversity, Mozilla Corporate has clearly taken sides against the American public and an unknown number of Mozilla employees on an issue for which other corporations, such as Cisco and Bank of America, have publicly stated they will ensure employee rights to their own opinion and protect their participation on matters of public policy while maintaining a safe and diverse workplace.  Mozilla has clearly failed in this regard.

WHEREAS – Workplace diversity is commonly accepted to refer to important personal traits such as race, religion, origin, physical ability or disability and ethnicity, Mozilla has opted to inappropriately include in their workplace the irrelevant and often fluid private issue of sexual proclivities making for a hostile working environment for those privately struggling with, objecting to certain behaviors or in the process of changing their personal sexual identity.

WHEREAS – the voting majority of the United States and the majority of nations hosting Mozilla operations have made clear their position on the public policy matter of so-called ‘gay’ marriage, Mozilla has taken an opposing position to their host nations and the voting majority of the US, thus a huge segment of their customers and an unknown number of its own employees.  The opinion of the American public in this regard was made clear in the unprecedented public reaction to incidents with Chick-Fil-A and A&E networks for which Mozilla seems determined to form a trio.

WHEREAS – Brendan Eich has been, and will go down in history as, an individual who has made rarely equaled contributions to society through technological advancement, Mozilla as a technology company appears to be making the statement that improving lives through technology is no longer their primary mission as it permits a workplace hostile to the talent making that mission possible.

WHEREAS – Mozilla’s allowance of this workplace hostility and the loss of Brendan Eich over a minor partisan political issue a priority over their purpose and mission – users, customers, investors and dependent businesses of Mozilla products would seem to want to question the reliability of Mozilla and their invested dependence on Mozilla products.

 

IN CONCLUSION – We, our members, supporters and supporting businesses call for Mozilla to make a clear statement to its employees as to whether this incident is a dog whistle to all pro-marriage, pro-family, pro-life and religious employees and talent to vacate the company or will Mozilla ensure a truly diverse and safe workplace environment for them.

IN CONCLUSION – We, our members, supporters and supporting businesses call for Mozilla to make a public statement to all of its pro-marriage, pro-family, pro-life and religious investors, users, supporters, personal and business customers as to whether Mozilla holds a discriminatory intent toward doing business with them based on their public policy participation or positions on those policies.

 

SIGNING ORGANIZATIONS:

 

-SEE BELOW-

SIGNED:

VOICE OF THE VOICELESS

CENTER FOR MARRIAGE POLICY

DAVID H. PICKUP, Licensed Marriage & Family Therapist

A-GATE SPRINGHEAD UK

MISSION AMERICA

Chaplain GORDON JAMERS KLINGENSCHMITT, Ph.D., ‘THE PRAY IN JESUS NAME PROJECT’

AFTAH

GABRIELE KUBY, Author

ANDRE VILLENUEVE, Ph.D. John Vianney Seminary

PARENTS AND FRIENDS OF GAYS AND EX-GAYS (PFOX)

HOMOSEXUALS ANONYMOUS

A-GATE UK

JASON – INTERNATIONAL EX-GAY MINISTRY

JONAH INTERNATIONAL

CATHOLICS FOR ISRAEL

HELP4FAMILIES

GAYMARRIAGENOTHANKS UK

PARAKALEO MINISTRY UK

BTS FACHGESELLSCHAFT für PSYCHOLOGIE und SEELSORGEE gGmbH, Germany

THE OVERCOMERS NETWORK

DR. ROBERT GAGNON, Ph.D

RESTORED HOPE NETWORK

LUKAS KIENER, M.D., Facharzt für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie FMHBärenmatte, Switzerland

AMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

 

 

Truth Wins Out! Illinois Becomes Fifth State to Reject Change Therapy Ban Bill

Education Campaign from Ex-Gays and Equality and Justice For All Key in Victory

projectq_ex-gay_press_conference_(1_of_2)

Anti-ex-gay activist Wayne Besen failed miserably to convince his own liberal-dominated legislature in Illinois to ban therapy for minor clients with unwanted SSA.

Late yesterday afternoon, the Illinois House voted 44 to 51 to reject HB 5569, a bill that would have prohibited minors with unwanted same-sex attraction (SSA) from receiving Sexual Orientation Change Effort (SOCE) therapy from a licensed mental health practitioner. Illinois became the fifth state in a row to reject this legislation, following Maryland, Minnesota, Washington, and Virginia, whose legislatures also voted down similar bills in 2014.

“It’s clear that even the most progressive states do not want to pass laws that take away the rights of individuals when the foundation of such legislation is based on lies and misinformation,” commented Christopher Doyle, President of Voice of the Voiceless. “There is not one research study published in the scientific peer-reviewed literature that has studied the outcomes of minors undergoing SOCE therapy – any attempt to ban clients from receiving help for unwanted SSA is pure political propaganda from gay activists.”

The Illinois Family Institute (who worked hard with ex-gays from Equality And Justice For All, the only non-profit organization dedicated to preserving the rights of ex-gay and clients with unwanted SSA) to educate legislators in the state to reject this bill, wrote the following of the bill’s lesbian sponsor, Kelly Cassidy: “In a remarkable display of rhetorical excess, Cassidy argued that minors who desire to change their unwanted SSA through counseling are ‘horribly and humiliatingly abused.’ It boggles the mind that Cassidy would expect her colleagues to believe that every counselor who helps minors with unwanted SSA ‘horribly and humiliatingly’ abuses their young clients. Further, Cassidy expected her colleagues to believe her without any conclusive studies to support such an outlandish claim.”

But this type of behavior is commonplace for gay activists. For example, last year a transgender activist in New Jersey claimed she was sent to a “conversion therapy torture camp” in Ohio that used electroshock therapy to zap her from gay to straight. An investigation published at WorldNetDaily.com found the entire “testimony” was a hoax taken from a 1997 movie starring drag queen RuPaul. Similarly a witness testifying in a January committee hearing in Washington said that a licensed therapist forced a child to watch pornography while in an ice bath so that the client would associate sexual arousal with pain. However, when questioned after the hearing, the woman refused to provide the name of the therapist and when it happened; nor was she willing to do any research to help uncover whether, if it had in fact happened, it was a licensed therapist.

“Legislatures around the country are now waking up to the reality that ex-gays are a fact and gay activists’ stories of ‘therapy torture’ are fiction,” commented Doyle. “We applaud the many lawmakers in Illinois who met with ex-gays, heard their stories of change, and refused to listen to the lies of anti-ex-gay activists like Wayne Besen, who is now headquartered in Chicago and failed miserably in his own liberal-dominated state to get this legislation passed. It goes to show that truth really does win out – when ex-gays speak up, politicians listen.”

 

###

Voice of the Voiceless is the only anti-defamation league defending the rights of former homosexuals, individuals with unwanted same-sex attractions, and their families. For more information, visit: www.VoiceoftheVoiceless.info

Why Does the World Not Want to Face the Pain of Child Abuse and SSA?

Written By: John Stephen W. of London, U.K
To Whom It May Concern:

A legal opinion rendered on January 27, 2014, by a United Kingdom Court of Appeal (Civil Division) profoundly spoke to a form of discrimination that I suffered during most of my life. The Court said, “Discrimination against a person because of his or her past actual or perceived sexual orientation, or because his or her sexual orientation has changed [from gay to straight, something most people in my life would not understand] is discrimination “because of ….sexual orientation.” My personal testimony below will show how inappropriate it is to box someone like myself into a gay identity, after all, change of sexual orientation is entirely possible and I am living proof of that fact.

I experienced what is called “unwanted same sex sexual attraction” (SSA) at the age of 10, when puberty began for me. Given the fact that I was sexually abused by my Father prior to that time, it is revealing that my first wet dream and several others thereafter were of my Father.  His sexual abuse began at about age 3 (possibly earlier) and continued until I was 7 1/2 years old. All of this occurred while I lived in Toronto. After we moved to the U.K., I blocked out the sexual activity with my Dad in Canada, and I recall only a few suggestive acts with him in the UK.

My mother was constantly depressed and anxious.  My father, on the other hand, was emotionally controlling and abusive.  I always felt alone because of the interactions within my extremely emotionally dysfunctional family of origin. I also felt alone because my father would not permit me to have friends. Indeed, during childhood, I was unable to talk with anyone about my feelings. Throughout my childhood, I had no positive male attention, apart from some occasional attention from teachers.

I began to deal with my traumatic childhood only after leaving home at age 21. However, my Grandmother died when I was 24 and this event added considerably to my difficulties in life. Why? Because my Father behaved himself whenever she stayed with us and thus she was the only adult I felt safe with. Her death was therefore very traumatic for me.  After her death, I began to have intense and frequent flashbacks of sexual activity with my Dad. I began to lose time and a sense of reality. I thought I was going mad.

Eventually I began to tell people. I told both my Mom and brother. Their responses were markedly different. My Mom was shocked and felt guilty she didn’t know what had happened (she was too traumatised by my Dad to notice much). My brother’s response was “I wonder if it happened to me too”. He is emotionally shut down and commented that if it did happen to him, it was likely too late for him to deal with it.

When I told my Aunt in the UK, she informed me about the significant physical, emotional and sexual abuse in my father’s family. She confirmed I was not going mad.

My Aunt in Toronto initially believed me and informed me how my Father tried to have sex with her when she was 17. When I wanted her to publicly support me and speak of her own abuse by my Father, she reneged on her support. She began to belittle my memories, and denied them by suggesting that I was simply confused about my own sexuality. She proceeded to tell my cousins and their husbands that I was ‘gay’, thinking that this would ‘help’ me. In reality, it made my pain and sense of rejection worse as I was labelled ‘gay’ at secondary school by other boys and some teachers because I didn’t fit their perception of what ‘straight’ meant. The discrimination against me became very real.

After confronting my Dad about the abuse he inflicted upon me, he died 3 days later. Thereafter, whether out of misplaced guilt or some other feeling, I shut down completely. Nevertheless, I was haunted by flashback memories, but without feelings, as if I was a dispassionate witness and was not really there. One vivid flashback I had was of him threatening me during the time we lived in Canada. He made it clear that I was not to tell anyone. After all, he said, did I want my brother and I to be put in foster care and see Mommy and Daddy put into prison?  During this period of time (1990 to about 2004), I continue to attempt to block out all unpleasant thoughts of my abuse. Of course, I did not progress in my healing in any meaningful way during this time.  In an effort to gain assistance, I sought help from the UK’s National Health System (NHS) but recognized that not only could they not help me, but, in fact, had made things worse for me by medicating me and by providing “gay affirmative” counseling.

I was always told by my Aunt in Toronto who first “outed” me to family members, and by therapists of the NHS, and the few friends I told at college about my confused sexuality, that my problems were because I hadn’t ‘come out of the closet’ and accept that I was ‘gay’. The conflict between my innermost feelings and messages from the above sources grew intense. Thus, I ended up languishing in the mental health system. They betrayed me by not listening to me and my INNERMOST feelings. Their advice and counsel was simple: I‘ll be OK once I was ‘honest‘ about being ‘gay‘. However, honesty was the last thing they wanted. They didn’t want honesty any more than my family wanted honesty. They just wanted another box to fit me in, as they didn’t see me fitting into the ‘straight’ box. This pattern of discrimination because of an assumed sexual orientation clouded my existence and my ability to be the real me.

All through this period of time, I could not find a therapist who would listen to me and help me overcome my sexual feelings for men. However, I noticed a particularly curious thing during this period. Whenever I felt negative about myself and rejected by others, especially if the rejection was by other males, my sexual feelings for men increased. However, whenever I felt somewhat good about myself or affirmed by men, especially by peers and those I perceived to have a strong personality or to be in authority, then I felt more sexual feelings for women and the sexual charges I had for men disappeared.  Also my sexual attraction to women would not last long because I perceived that people would consider such an attitude as ‘sexually aggressive.’  No one at that time could explain this phenomena to me.

It was only when I reached 40 (it was 2004) that I finally received some encouragement to fight to help myself. This help came from a Swiss Jewish friend who himself had been physically/emotionally abused in childhood and had received holistic help to overcome such abuse in his early 20’s. That was a turning point in my life. I have been fighting ever since to find the same kind of help and to allow the inner child within me to be protected by the adult me. My inner child had been trapped and unable to express himself ever since the sexual abuse began when I was 3, or possibly earlier.

During my late 30s, before meeting my Swiss friend, I had contemplated getting married to a woman who herself was a sexual abuse survivor and who also suffered with sexual attraction to her own sex.  I had sexual attraction to her, and she for me, but she used our relationship to blame me for her pain, rather than face her own inner pain and truth.  So we broke up. The experience however taught me how I had to fight to first recognize my own inner truth and only after doing so would I be able to find another soul with whom I could connect in marriage.

To assist me in my healing, I went to a Men’s Sexual Abuse Survivors Group Workshop. The facilitators asked us to identify either as homosexual or heterosexual. Of the 18 men present, only one other man and I said our feelings changed depending on how we felt about ourselves; that we have feelings for men most of the time because we felt un-affirmed by males. He also acknowledged the curious situation I discovered earlier in my life:  Whenever we felt affirmed by men or generally felt better about ourselves, that was when we had feelings for women. In further discussion with him, we both found something else in common. Our respective mothers used us as surrogate husbands; they unloaded their emotional baggage on us.  Moreover, both of us had also been ‘stuck’ in the mental health system. Unfortunately, he still was. Ultimately, he found he couldn’t cope with the Survivors Group and stopped coming.

Another member of the group I got to know who identified as ‘straight’ admitted to me privately that he had sexual feelings for men, but was afraid of them, while another guy who identified as ‘gay’  admitted to me in private the opposite: he had feelings for women, but was afraid of them.  Unfortunately, the Sexual Abuse Survivors Group refused to deal with these confusions. We either had to be “gay” or “straight” and they said it was impossible to change from one to the other and ‘homophobic’ to say it is possible.  I wish the UK Appellate Court referred to in my first paragraph would have spoken years earlier so perhaps this black and white discriminatory characterization would not have been present.

After my Mom died in 2007, my brother and his wife began to emotionally abuse me. So after dividing our Mom’s estate, I chose to lose contact first with the extended family who wanted to box me in as “gay” and then separated from my brother. I haven’t seen him since 2010 and I have not spoken to him since 2012.  I believed this separation was beneficial as I found myself capable of exercising my free will and for the first time to choose who I wanted to be with or didn’t want to be with. I started moving from a perception that I was stuck as a “gay” identified man and would be unable to experience feelings, behavior, and identify as a “straight” man to actually believe I could feel comfortable as a man with men of all kinds and some one who can relate to women as potential sexual partners and to one woman as a spouse.

Still seeking a path to healing, I found a charity based in London that provides affordable therapy for survivors of childhood sexual abuse.  Initially I was assigned to a woman but found I couldn’t talk with her about sexual stuff. Therefore, the charity reassigned me to a male therapist who is older than me. I was able to inform him about my feelings concerning my various sexual experiences, whether they were with women or men. Given my past experience with counselors who felt that sexuality was immutable and unchangeable, I asked him in a most direct manor 2 critical questions for me: was he taught and did he believe that one’s focus and sexual feelings are immutable and unchangeable? While he admitted that was how he was taught, he indicated his openness to learning differently from his clients. I felt a magical release because of his attitude and finally began to feel safe to reveal my most hidden secrets about myself and others in my life while affirmatively working to change (in the words of the Court of Appeal) my ‘actual or perceived sexual orientation.’

Over the last few months I have, at last, been more honest with myself. My therapist encouraged me to go with my feelings as to what helps me and to get in touch with the feelings trapped by my childhood.  With regard to the sexual feelings, he encourages me to let the feelings pass without judgement in order to see how significant they really are. The cumulative effect of all this has been that I have begun to re-experience the flashbacks I had before my Dad died, but now with FEELINGS; I was no longer simply a dispassionate witness. This included the strong urges I had as a kid to perform sexual things with other adult men just like I experienced with my Dad. I realized that my experiences set me up to believe that sex was the method by which love between men ought to be expressed rather than expressed in an authentic non-sexual method of healthy bonding. As a result, I have gradually been diminishing the desire to act out SSA feelings or even to experience such feelings. My feelings for connection with other men are transforming into healthy non-sexual desires to simply relate to them as friends.

I often watch movies in order to connect with others in similar situations as there is no group or individuals in London for me to connect with emotionally, only a Survivors Group in which I feel reluctant to talk about my intimate sexual feelings because in this particular group there are only women present and the prevailing attitude is that so-called “ex-gays” do not exist.

I often use DVD’s that deal with traumas of different kinds and then journal or think through how I feel about what I watched.  The last one I watched was of two 17 year-olds in Australia who find they have a sexual attraction for each other whilst working on a school project together. They both come from broken homes, one has an aggressive alcoholic Dad and the other has an emotionally detached Dad who divorced his Mom after his older brother died at 10. Unexpectedly this video reminded me of  the loss I felt when I came to the UK at around 7 and when my older brother was 10.  After the boy with the alcoholic Dad kills himself because his Dad found out about the sexual nature of the relationship with his friend, I began to grieve the loss I felt at losing the childhood relationship with my brother.  I began to feel desperate to reconnect with him. I also remembered feeling lost as to how to connect with other children in general, but particularly boys. I always had girls at school who wanted to be with me. While it was comforting to have friends who were girls, I realized how much I also resented it because it deprived me of what I needed most: male companionship.

In 2008 I learned of JONAH and began connecting with them, first online and later in person. They became a lifeline for me. I was initially afraid of being too involved but I recognized from the information on their website and from their online support group several things that were clearly true for me. This trust factor enabled me to start dealing more directly with my difficulties in life. At their urging, I went to a JiM (Journey Into Manhood) weekend in England. The JiM weekend gave me a space to be with other men who felt similarly and also didn’t want their feelings put into a box. I realized there was a world of men like me: people who were pushed into identifying as gay even though our personal and/or religious belief system as to the life we wanted differed.  There were different processes in which I participated. Some helped, others didn’t.  The ones that most helped me were experiential in nature. I used props to act out various scenes from my life and in turn gain a greater understanding about them.  Also, I let go of some repressed anger when I was able to hit a punching bag with a bat. I also learned how to “clear” feelings of envy that I was experiencing for another guy in the group, which in turn I had sexualised. After doing this process, the sexualisation was no longer there. Other helpful experiences involved my ability to shout and thus express some of my feelings of anger and lost connections to my Dad and brother.

I believe I need to do more of this kind of work, but I can’t afford it at the present. Because of the continuing problems with my brother and his wife, I was forced to move and I lost my job. In spite of this adversity, I continue to fight to connect with my feelings and to work through the feelings that I internalized as a kid.

Over the last few years I found two guys who became my friends and confidants.  They let me stay or invite me round socially at their family home when I despair of coping with life on my own, and now I feel equal to them and can look forward to socializing with them and others without my issues being the focus. Both families are very emotionally expressive and their openness to emotions helps me to express my own feelings without fear. As I mentioned earlier, I have gradually begun to have much less desire to act out SSA feelings and more feelings of “I like him or her, perhaps we can be friends”. In other words, even though I am nearly 50, I have finally begun to re-parent myself and to take responsibility for my feelings and in the process to grow out of my former compulsive behavior. I have also learned self care, accepting and properly interpreting my basic needs which were ignored as a kid.

I now feel a lot more hope for the future than I have ever felt in my life, including a belief that I am worthy and that I deserve to have male friends with whom I can connect in a healthy non-sexual relationship of mutual love and respect. Also, I am optimistic that I am in a position to find a wife who can be my partner in life and may also provide the ultimate in friendship and companionship. Finally, I look to pass onto future generations the knowledge that change of sexual orientation is possible and to be both a mentor and an example to so many others who have encountered the kind of discrimination that I have.

I have moved on from society’s labels of “gay” or “straight” and the mental health establishment’s label of “Bipolar.” My former mood swings and compulsive thoughts and behavior are becoming a thing of the past. I am a far more stable person because I am able to process my feelings better. A key aspect of this ability to focus better comes from being able to live in the present, rather than living either in the past or in the future.

Without organisations like JONAH, I wouldn’t have known that others feel the same way as I do about SSA. I would have continued to exist isolated and alone. Learning from them that the Hebrew word “to’eviah” in the Torah (Leviticus 18:22 concerning sexual relations with other men), is explained in the Talmud as meaning one is ‘led astray’ (rather than abomination) truly resonates with me. I felt ‘led astray’ for the better part of my life as I was boxed into an identity as ‘gay.’  This is not to condemn other people with homosexual feelings or behaviour and who may not feel led astray. For those who identify themselves as “gay”, I am not here to judge them nor to accept nor love them any less. On the other hand, why can’t those who so identify, and society in general, accept my journey and let me get support?  Perhaps the new decision of the British Court of Appeals may provide me and people like me with the recognition we have craved for so long, that is, to recognize that change of sexual orientation is possible and to allow us to live our lives consistent with our own personal and religious value structure. This article was originally published at: http://jonahweb.org/article.php?secId=362

Psychiatrists Oppose Illinois SSA Therapy Ban

 

Caring Clinicians
P.O. Box 5517
Glendale, AZ 85312
 
March 23, 2014
 
Dear Committee Member:
 
May we respectfully suggest that the efforts of some to ban SOCE therapy in Illinois are:
 
  • An unfounded overreach without support in scientific research. (Even the APA’s task force made up of gay activists and gay affirming professionals – without one professional who actually does SOCE(!), said there wasn’t enough research to say whether it was harmful or beneficial)
 
  • Based on the false notion that same sex attraction or homosexuality is innate.  The multiple large identical twin studies show that this is clearly false.  For example the 2008 Santilla et al study involving thousands of identical twins found, that if one of a twin pair was gay the other was gay only 10% of the time, and if one was lesbian the other was only 14% of the time. 
 
  • Even the APA no longer supports this false notion that homosexuality is innate, and suggests the causes are mixture of environmental and genetic influences. Dr. Francis Collins MD, PH.D., the former head of the human genome project, and a very caring individual of gays on a personal level, says it is “not hardwired”.  We know of no credible scientific source that still holds to the false notion that homosexuality is hardwired or innate.
 
  • While we respect the rights of those who want to live a gay or lesbian lifestyle, we would strongly affirm that it is only fair and reasonable that those who want to live a heterosexual lifestyle also be given the rights and freedom to do so.
 
  • There has been research available for decades which clearly shows, that change is possible for those who want to change their sexual orientation.  For example in February 1984, in The American Journal of Psychiatry, Master and Schwartz, from the then world famous Master and Johnson Institute, were able to change a large majority of those who sought change.  They had only a 20% failure rate (or 80% success rate) in their efforts to change patients from a homosexual orientation to a heterosexual lifestyle.  Five years later their failure rate was still only 28% or a 72% success rate.  More recently Jones and Yarhouse in 2007 found success rates for those wanting help to change their same sex attraction similar to those for antidepressant treatment of depression in the STAR*D study.
 
  • Those who are wrongly forced to live with unwanted same sex attraction will unfortunately face the same documented medical and psychological problems faced by those in the gay lifestyle which include:
                       -Increased rates of depression, drug abuse, suicidal ideation and behavior              
                – Tremendously increased rates of HIV infection and AIDS
                – Increased rates of Hepatitis B and C  
                – Increased rates of anal and colon cancer
 
If the goal is to get rid of aversion therapies in the treatment of minors why limit it just to SOCE?   Why not ban it as a therapy regardless of the treatment goal, and if the goal is truly to protect the health of minors, then banning SOCE therapy is a huge step in the wrong direction and will clearly lead to extreme harm and even death in some if not many minors over the years. 
 
For those who are willing to be open minded and intellectually honest we recommend viewing the 32 minute documentary  “Understanding Same-sex Attraction”.
 
Please feel free to share this information with colleagues, as some will not have received it or may have had their screeners set it aside.
 
Respectfully,
John H. Raney, M.D., ABPN
Anthony Duk, M.D. ABPN
John Raney

Anthony Duk

 

 

Take Away Hope and You Kill a Child: Illinois Advances Hope Killing Legislation

bio picture-2

Voice of the Voiceless Advisory Board Member, Chuck Peters

“The Emperor Wears No Clothes” or “The Emperor Has No Clothes” is often used in political and social contexts for any obvious truth denied by the majority, despite the evidence to their own eyes. This title is most appropriate when discussing the current “debate” over prohibiting minors from receiving Sexual Orientation Change Effort Therapy (SOCE) from licensed mental health practitioners.

The urban myth that has been disseminated among the general populace, and apparently most of the representatives in every capital building in every state of the USA on the topic of homosexuality is:  “Born that way, cannot change.” Yet just about every piece of scientific evidence in the literature proves just the opposite of this 40 year old antiquated statement.

Every professor of human sexuality at any major reputable university will attest to the fact that human sexual orientation is fluid. 

In fact, even the former President of the American Psychological Association, Dr. Nicholas Cummings, said under oath that he has treated thousands of homosexuals and they have changed to heterosexuals and are living happy lives!

Moreover, neurologists have known for years that our brains are “plastic” – that is that our brains can form new neural connections as we change and grow throughout our lives.

Furthermore, even the courts have recognized that Ex-gays are now a legally protected class and New York Mayor DiBlasio’s wife recently came out as an Ex-gay!

Yet, these foundational facts of human sexuality have seemed to escape homosexual activist lawyers, homosexual elected officials, or homosexual legal aids, and pretty much any author of a bill to ban SOCE therapy.

I have learned that you can’t have an honest debate about sexual orientation change with a homosexual because of their inherent homosexual bias.

Gay activists in our political systems are hell bent on shaming and stigmatizing anyone who believes in these foundational truths about human sexuality. This homosexual bias perpetrated by elected homosexual activists and has turned into a Jedi mind trick on their heterosexual colleagues and general public.

That’s exactly what my experience has been with nearly every heterosexual state representative I met in Pennsylvania, Maryland, Washington, DC and Illinois.

 

Once the heterosexuals look at this subject objectively through the eyes of science, they’ll realize that shoving the homosexual agenda down a 13 year old’s throat is not only wrong, it becomes another form of child abuse.  Not perpetrated by society but by the homosexual activists themselves.

 

This was my experience when I testified against the Child Mental health welfare bill in Illinois this week, which passed the most recent SOCE therapy ban bill with a vote of 9-6.

 

Lesbian Rep. Kelly M. Cassidy is the sponsor of the ill-conceived “Youth Mental Health Protection Act”. This bill does nothing to protect the mental health of any child except to tell a minor child if you have a homosexual thought or feeling, you need to collapse that into your identity, grab your rainbow flag, and live the rest of your life as a homosexual.

 

Essentially, this bill is another form of child abuse at the hands of the militant gay activists like Rep. Kelly M. Cassidy. If this bill would have been a law when I was a child I would not be writing this article today. When I was being groomed and molested by my gay Boy Scout master at the age of 11, I was suicidal and confused about my sexuality.  On the one hand, I was receiving all the attention, affirmation, and affection from a pedophile, but on the other hand, he was sexualizing our relationship at the same time and taking advantage of my vulnerability.

 

Essentially, I felt quintessentially “gay” but knew deep down inside that I wasn’t. If it weren’t for the fact that I was able to receive appropriate mental health treatment for my sexual confusion and suicidality from a licensed professional, I know for a fact that I would have killed myself. I would have killed myself not because I thought I was gay, but that I was in so much unbearable emotional pain as a teenager that I naively thought the only way out was to take my own life.

 

This bill and others that have been introduced through our country only serve to further increase the suicide rate among our teenagers. If you want to kill a minor child, take away hope. This is what this bill and others just like it have attempted to do.

 

I was shocked but not surprised when I was told by two of the gay activist attorneys’ who wrote and twisted Washington DC’s Council member Mary Cheh’s arm to sponsor a similar bill to prohibit minor children from receiving mental health treatment for unwanted same sex attraction. During our conversation I told them when I was a teenager I had homosexual feelings but didn’t’ want to be gay. They both agreed with me and said when they were teenagers they didn’t’ want to be gay either and then they went further to say that “no teenager wants to be gay.”

 

This exactly proves why these child abusive bills should never see the light of day. What business does the state have to intrude on a private therapy session between a kid and his therapist? If a child doesn’t want to be gay let him figure it out with his therapist. The state has no business gagging a therapist from allowing a child to grow up and have a natural family and life the life he/she wants to live.

 

In Illinois, once I and other ex-gays shared the facts of what SOCE therapy actually is,

that there is not one shred of scientific evidence showing it causes harm, and

that folks like myself who have received SOCE are alive and living the lives that they want, many changed their minds. Previously, all they heard were indoctrination and lies by gay activists. Unfortunately, too many on the committee had already been brainwashed.

 

However, despite their ignorance, I can proclaim that today I feel more loved now than I ever have in my entire life. I no longer want to kill myself and no longer see myself being stuck in the gay community where I never felt right.

 

Any cognitive behavior therapist will tell you that what you believe about yourself is what you will manifest in your life. It appears that the militant gay activists are still stuck in the 70’s with the ”I was born this way and I can’t change” mantra. It’s about time the gay community caught up with the times and educate the world to the fact that you can live any life you want, including one where you change sexual orientation.

 

In the meantime, the lives of our suicidal kids are too precious to be left in their own hands. Let them seek the mental health treatment that may save their lives. I know if my life would have been left in my own hands I would be dead. I pray that the children in Illinois will be as fortunate as me.

To sign the petition and tell the Illinois Legislature “Don’t take hope away from children with unwanted same-sex attractions” click here. 

Chuck Peters, originally from Arizona, holds a Bachelors of Science in Psychology from the United States Air Force Academy and is the Director of the Sexual Orientation Change Institute in Beverly Hills, California. He is an Advisory Board member of Voice of the Voiceless. For more information, visit: www.VoiceoftheVoiceless.info