Category Archives: Political Correctness

PUBLIC STATEMENT AND REQUEST FOR FORMAL CLARIFICATION BY MOZILLA CORPORATION REGARDING THE RESIGNATION OF CEO BRENDAN EICH

PUBLIC STATEMENT AND REQUEST FOR FORMAL CLARIFICATION BY MOZILLA CORPORATION REGARDING THE RESIGNATION OF CEO BRENDAN EICH

Update: Read the article on LifeSiteNews.com by clicking here

Date: 04/04/14

 

To:  Mozilla Corporation

 

In review of the recent circumstances which resulted in the resignation of Brendan Eich as CEO of Mozilla Corporation significant concerns of a large number of individuals and businesses have been raised.  Those affected include organizations comprised and representative of those individuals who have changed or seek to change their sexual preference, their supporters and supporting businesses, and individuals and businesses supporting Mozilla and supporting or participating Mozilla employees.  Upon review of details reported in the press and statements made both during and after Mr. Eich’s resignation by Mozilla, our organizations have made the following observations and conclusions:

WHEREAS – Mozilla touts an inclusive, safe environment embracing and defending diversity within its organization, it contrarily allowed for a workplace environment so hostile to Mr. Eich as to pressure him into resignation.

WHEREAS – Mozilla touts inclusiveness within its business, it inappropriately uses personal and private opinions, including non-work related activities, as a justification to allow for a hostile workplace environment in support of internal populist politics and to punish employees for their rightful participation in matters of public policy.

WHEREAS – Mozilla defends the notion of diversity, Mozilla Corporate has clearly taken sides against the American public and an unknown number of Mozilla employees on an issue for which other corporations, such as Cisco and Bank of America, have publicly stated they will ensure employee rights to their own opinion and protect their participation on matters of public policy while maintaining a safe and diverse workplace.  Mozilla has clearly failed in this regard.

WHEREAS – Workplace diversity is commonly accepted to refer to important personal traits such as race, religion, origin, physical ability or disability and ethnicity, Mozilla has opted to inappropriately include in their workplace the irrelevant and often fluid private issue of sexual proclivities making for a hostile working environment for those privately struggling with, objecting to certain behaviors or in the process of changing their personal sexual identity.

WHEREAS – the voting majority of the United States and the majority of nations hosting Mozilla operations have made clear their position on the public policy matter of so-called ‘gay’ marriage, Mozilla has taken an opposing position to their host nations and the voting majority of the US, thus a huge segment of their customers and an unknown number of its own employees.  The opinion of the American public in this regard was made clear in the unprecedented public reaction to incidents with Chick-Fil-A and A&E networks for which Mozilla seems determined to form a trio.

WHEREAS – Brendan Eich has been, and will go down in history as, an individual who has made rarely equaled contributions to society through technological advancement, Mozilla as a technology company appears to be making the statement that improving lives through technology is no longer their primary mission as it permits a workplace hostile to the talent making that mission possible.

WHEREAS – Mozilla’s allowance of this workplace hostility and the loss of Brendan Eich over a minor partisan political issue a priority over their purpose and mission – users, customers, investors and dependent businesses of Mozilla products would seem to want to question the reliability of Mozilla and their invested dependence on Mozilla products.

 

IN CONCLUSION – We, our members, supporters and supporting businesses call for Mozilla to make a clear statement to its employees as to whether this incident is a dog whistle to all pro-marriage, pro-family, pro-life and religious employees and talent to vacate the company or will Mozilla ensure a truly diverse and safe workplace environment for them.

IN CONCLUSION – We, our members, supporters and supporting businesses call for Mozilla to make a public statement to all of its pro-marriage, pro-family, pro-life and religious investors, users, supporters, personal and business customers as to whether Mozilla holds a discriminatory intent toward doing business with them based on their public policy participation or positions on those policies.

 

SIGNING ORGANIZATIONS:

 

-SEE BELOW-

SIGNED:

VOICE OF THE VOICELESS

CENTER FOR MARRIAGE POLICY

DAVID H. PICKUP, Licensed Marriage & Family Therapist

A-GATE SPRINGHEAD UK

MISSION AMERICA

Chaplain GORDON JAMERS KLINGENSCHMITT, Ph.D., ‘THE PRAY IN JESUS NAME PROJECT’

AFTAH

GABRIELE KUBY, Author

ANDRE VILLENUEVE, Ph.D. John Vianney Seminary

PARENTS AND FRIENDS OF GAYS AND EX-GAYS (PFOX)

HOMOSEXUALS ANONYMOUS

A-GATE UK

JASON – INTERNATIONAL EX-GAY MINISTRY

JONAH INTERNATIONAL

CATHOLICS FOR ISRAEL

HELP4FAMILIES

GAYMARRIAGENOTHANKS UK

PARAKALEO MINISTRY UK

BTS FACHGESELLSCHAFT für PSYCHOLOGIE und SEELSORGEE gGmbH, Germany

THE OVERCOMERS NETWORK

DR. ROBERT GAGNON, Ph.D

RESTORED HOPE NETWORK

LUKAS KIENER, M.D., Facharzt für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie FMHBärenmatte, Switzerland

AMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

 

 

Holyfield comments test GLAAD’s tolerance meter

Yet again, gay activists have pointed a wagging judgmental finger, telling us one thing but doing another. Recently, there have been two reality TV stars that have come out as not supportive of homosexuality, sparking a wave of political outrage.

In December, the TV network A&E suspended Phil Robertson after GLAAD protested his comments regarding homosexuality in an interview with GQ magazine. Then in early January, Celebrity Big Brother UK “reprimanded” heavyweight boxing champ Evander Holyfield for voicing his view of homosexuality to a fellow contestant, Luisa Zissman. While discussing the number of openly gay men in the world of boxing, Holyfield stated that being gay was not normal and that it was something that could be changed.

In both instances, the comments were made in a respectful way without apology, but not good enough for GLAAD, the gay rights keeper of the tolerance flame. These are only the latest instances of GLAAD’s oppression of anyone who disagrees with them while simultaneously demanding that everyone else be tolerant. In 2012, GLAAD published what it dubbed the Commentator’s Accountability Project. Although officially not intended to get commentators off the air, the character assassination attempt is quite apparent. Then in 2013, GLAAD reviled National Geographic for not including a disclaimer regarding the Boy Scout’s policy on homosexuality before their reality TV show, Are You Tougher Than A Boy Scout.  Apparently, being respectful and non-judgmental is no longer considered to be tolerant. According to GLAAD’s behavior, tolerance is not disagreeing with their position, period.  Seems to me the roles have reversed. Now it is the “oppressed minority” who has become the oppressor, trying to silence any form of dissent from their world view.
Thankfully, all is not lost. In the days and weeks following his suspension, Phil Robertson received a lot of grassroots support, especially through social media, and even saw a significant rise in book sales. A&E eventually reinstated Phil, reportedly as a financial move to keep viewership, citing the usual disclaimer about the network not endorsing the views of any one particular actor.

Although vocal support for Evander Holyfield  was not as strong as it was for Robertson, he has had people step into his corner. Mostly notably, the Atlanta based Overcomers Network,  committed to promoting peer to peer empowerment and sexual holiness, especially when it comes to EXLGBT issues. The Network released a statement saying that Holyfield respectfully told the honest truth and pulled no punches.

“Evander hasn’t lived a perfect life and we all know that”, said Pastor DL Foster, Founder and President of the ON, “but you don’t have to be perfect to tell the truth.”


Nathan Ruark is Secretary of Voice of the Voiceless and resides in Grand Rapids, MI. He carries the rank of Specialist in the Michigan Army National Guard where he works as a radar repairer. He holds a Bachelors of Science degree in Psychology from Grand Valley State University. He has volunteered with Sexual Orientation Change Effort (SOCE) programs for the previous 10 years and publicly advocated for SOCE rights for the past 4 years.

Lesbian Feminist Camille Paglia: “Sexual Orientation is Fluid and Can Change”

Camille-Paglia-01.jpgLesbian feminist and university professor Camille Paglia was recently a guest on the Dennis Prager show. I have included a brief discourse of one of her segments that was interesting, especially in light of the fact that she is a self-identified lesbian. Her analysis on the current trend of psychology, which she says is being destroyed by politics, is priceless. Below the quote is a link to listen to the entire interview.

“Every single gay person I know has some sort of drama going on, back in childhood. Something was happening that we’re not allowed to ask about anymore . . . I can see patterns that are similar in my background to that of other women I know who are lesbians, but the biggest patterns are in gay men. Every single gay man I know had a particular pattern where for whatever reason, he was closer to his mother than to his father, and there was some sort of distance between the mother and the father, so that she looked to her son as her real equal or friend, as the real companion of her soul. Sometimes these women were discreet and dignified. Other times, they were very theatrical and in a sense they drafted their son into their own drama. But now, you are not allowed to ask any questions about the childhood of gay people anymore. It’s called ‘homophobic’. The entire psychology establishment has shut itself down, politically . . . and also, Freud was kicked out by early feminism in the late 60s and early 70s. So all the sophistication of analysis that I knew in my college years when I went to the state university of New York – there were a group of radical young Jewish students from the New York area – they were so psychologically sophisticated in being able to analyze the family background. It’s all gone, that entire discourse is gone. Everything is political now. Families are bankrupting themselves, sending their kids to the elite schools to learn a political style of analysis (that says) ‘every single thing in the human person has been formed by some external force upon us, we are oppressed, it’s being inscribed on us’. It’s really sick. It’s a sick and stupid way of looking at human psychology . . . we are in a period now of psychological stupidity.”

Listen to the whole segment by clicking below